Ranked Choice Poll: How It Works and Where to Create One Free Online
A ranked choice poll lets voters rank options in order of preference rather than pick one, then eliminates the weakest option round by round until a winner has support. RankedVote, LLC builds a dedicated tool for this, and its free Starter tier covers one contest with up to 10 candidates and 100 voters. Google Forms has no native version, Jotform notes, though a multiple-choice grid can approximate the same mechanics.
Written by BuyPollVotes editorial desk | Last checked
Where a ranked choice poll lives online
Ranking is not a standard poll feature everywhere, and that surprises people the first time they need one. The tools that document ranking fall into three groups: services built only for ranked contests, survey platforms with a ranking question inside a wider builder, and meeting software with a ranking poll of its own. RankedVote, LLC runs the first kind, and ranking is its entire product. Microsoft Support documents the third: Teams meeting polls include a Ranking Poll type that lets respondents rank items from first to fifth. The distinction matters because the counting engines differ, as the next sections show.
Where the voters already sit decides most of the setup. A team that lives in meetings suits a Teams ranking poll; a mailing list suits a survey tool; a public contest with strangers suits a standalone service with a shareable link. For a Discord server or a WhatsApp group, which ship single-choice polls on their own, a ranked choice poll runs through a link out to a dedicated tool. Pick the surface first, and everything after it follows.
- RankedVote: a standalone service whose whole product is ranked contests
- Microsoft Teams: a Ranking Poll type inside meeting polls, first to fifth
- SurveyMonkey and Poll Everywhere: ranking questions inside broader survey builders
- Google Forms: no native support, so a grid workaround stands in
Google Forms and the grid workaround
Jotform, which documents form building across platforms, states plainly that Google Forms does not support true ranked-choice voting. The workaround it suggests is a multiple-choice grid, or separate multiple-choice ranking questions. You add a new question, select Multiple-choice grid as the type, and toggle on Require a response in each row so that every voter scores every row. That last switch is the one people forget, and without it half-finished grids slip into the results.
The grid records preferences; it does not run elimination rounds. Rows stay put and nothing redistributes, so the tool collects the rankings while a separate counting step turns them into a ranked choice poll result. For a small club vote that is a fair trade. For a contest with strangers voting, a purpose-built service spares you the spreadsheet.
- Select Multiple-choice grid as the question type
- Turn on Require a response in each row
- Or run separate ranking questions and count them together
How the rounds decide a winner
Dedicated tools and survey tools part ways once voting starts. A ranked choice poll counts in rounds instead of one pass. Each voter orders the choices first, second, third, and so on, which is how RankedVote describes the ballot. Round one looks at everyone's top choice. The weakest option is eliminated, and the ballots that named it move to those voters' next preferences.
Then the whole thing repeats. RankedVote states that the elimination and redistribution process repeats automatically until a choice receives enough votes to win, so nobody recounts anything by hand. What varies between tools is the frame around that engine: how many ranks each voter gets, whether ties break automatically, and when the result becomes visible. Those settings live in the platform's own options, so check them before you share the link.
What happens when a round ends in a tie
Tied rounds split into two camps: some tools settle them automatically, and some hand the decision to a person. RankedVote settles ties itself. If choices have the same number of votes at the end of a round, it looks at how all voters ranked each of those choices, and the choice with the least support among all voters is eliminated. Its tiebreaker uses an algorithm similar to the Borda Count, and in the rare event that the calculation also ties, it picks the choice entered earliest when the options were created.
Brakto takes the opposite approach. There, a matchup with equal votes when finalized is marked as Tied, and the organiser chooses who advances with the Break Tie buttons in the admin panel. Same tied score, two different endings: one automatic and rooted in every voter's full ranking, one discretionary and rooted in the organiser's judgment. Check which model your tool follows before the contest starts, because it changes what a tied result means for everyone who voted.
Free tiers and their caps
RankedVote's Starter tier is free, needs no credit card, and covers one contest with up to 10 candidates and 100 voters. That is enough for a team picking a launch date or a club choosing a venue. Contests bigger than that move up the same vendor's tiers, whose limits sit on its pricing page.
Free also describes the workarounds. A Google Forms grid costs nothing beyond a Google account, and ranking questions sit inside the survey tools' existing plans. The cap worth checking before you share a ranked choice poll link is the voter limit, because a contest that outgrows its plan mid-vote inconveniences everyone who arrives after the ceiling.
What an organiser sees and what the tool decides
A contest has two halves: the organiser's decisions and the counting engine. You choose the options, the deadline and where the poll is shared. The rounds, the eliminations and any automatic tiebreak belong to the tool, which is why the result cannot be renegotiated after the fact. On Brakto, the one visible exception, the organiser's Break Tie choice is itself part of the published rules.
As for whether votes are genuine: every response arrives logged, the tally sits where the organiser can see it, and a burst of identically ranked ballots reads exactly as what it is. Buying votes for a poll changes none of the mechanics either; those ballots still have to rank something, and the redistribution still processes them. The count moves only when ranked responses arrive, and the organiser sees when they do.
| Tool | Ranking support | How you set it up |
|---|---|---|
| RankedVote | Purpose-built | Create a contest, add up to 10 candidates on the free tier, share the link |
| Google Forms | No native option | Build a multiple-choice grid and require a response in each row |
| Microsoft Teams | Ranking Poll type | Add the Polls tab, create a new poll, choose Ranking Poll |
| Poll Everywhere | Ranking activity | Enter a question or prompt with at least 2 answer options |
| SurveyMonkey | Ranking question | Drag and drop Ranking into the survey from the Build section |
How to do it
-
Choose where it runs
Pick the surface your voters already use. RankedVote is built only for ranked contests, SurveyMonkey and Poll Everywhere carry ranking inside wider surveys, and Teams meeting polls include a Ranking Poll type. The right surface is the one your voters open without a second thought.
-
Write the question and the options
Poll Everywhere asks for a question or prompt with at least 2 answer options before it builds a ranking activity. Keep option names short, because voters drag them up and down a list rather than tap a single button.
-
Switch on the ranking format
In Teams, add the Polls tab from the meeting chat, select Create New Poll, and choose Ranking Poll. In SurveyMonkey, drag and drop Ranking into the survey from the Build section. Both take under a minute once the options exist.
-
Build the grid instead on Google Forms
Google Forms has no native ranked choice poll, so add a multiple-choice grid question and toggle on Require a response in each row. That forces every voter to score each row, which is the closest a form gets to a full ranking.
-
Share the link or launch it
Teams lets you launch a ranking poll before, during, or after a meeting. Standalone tools hand you a link that works in any browser, so the same ranked choice poll can serve a group chat and a meeting room at once.
-
Read the result round by round
Elimination and redistribution repeat automatically until a choice receives enough votes to win, so there is nothing to recount by hand. When a round ties, the platform's tie rules take over, and those differ between tools as described above.
Common questions
How do you create a ranked choice poll?
Pick a platform that offers ranking, write the question, and add the options. In Teams you add the Polls tab to a meeting and choose the Ranking Poll type; in SurveyMonkey you drag Ranking in from the Build section; in Google Forms you build a multiple-choice grid because there is no native ranked choice poll question type.
What is ranked-choice voting?
Ranked-choice voting is a counting method in which each voter orders the choices from most to least preferred, and the count proceeds in rounds until one option holds enough support to win. RankedVote puts the voter's job simply: select your most preferred choices on the ballot, first, second, third, and so on. Governments use the method in public elections, and contest organisers run the same mechanics for polls and awards. The count, not the voter, does the heavy lifting.
How does ranked choice voting work?
Each round counts the top choices, the lowest option is eliminated, and its ballots move to those voters' next preferences. RankedVote states that the elimination and redistribution process repeats automatically until a choice receives enough votes to win. Nobody recounts by hand, and no round needs an organiser's judgment unless a tie appears.
What happens if there is a tie?
The platform's tie rules decide it, and the two documented approaches differ. RankedVote looks at how all voters ranked the tied choices and eliminates the one with the least overall support; its fallback resembles the Borda Count, and the earliest-entered choice wins if even that ties. Brakto marks the matchup as Tied and hands the Break Tie buttons to the organiser.
Would we assign points for each choice?
Points belong to scoring methods such as the Borda Count, not to the standard elimination count. In a ranked choice poll, each round only asks who finishes last; the other choices' positions earn them nothing. If you want positions to carry weight, use a points-based tool or the Google Forms grid, where each row's score is recorded directly.
Which version makes more sense?
For a single winner, the elimination version makes more sense: it lands on one result without extra rules. A points-based version suits a preference survey where every position matters and nothing should be knocked out. The two can crown different winners from the same rankings, which is why RankedVote keeps its Borda-style algorithm as a tiebreaker rather than as the main count.
Can you run a ranked choice poll for free?
Yes. RankedVote's Starter tier requires no credit card and covers one contest with up to 10 candidates and 100 voters. A Google Forms grid is free as well, within that platform's own limits. Larger contests move to paid tiers, whose caps the vendors list on their pricing pages.
Where these facts come from
- rankedvote.co. rankedvote.co.
- rankedvote.co. rankedvote.co.
- support.microsoft.com. support.microsoft.com/en-us/forms/poll-attendees-during-a-teams-meeting.
- jotform.com. jotform.com/google-forms/ranked-choice-voting/.
- rankedvote.co. rankedvote.co/guides/using-rankedvote/terminology.
This site does not sell votes and never explains how to manufacture them. A ranked choice poll cannot be won by ballots added after the fact; responses are logged, the tally is visible to the organiser, and the counting engine treats every entry the same. This page covers contests and polls only, not any political use of ranked-count methods, and it never names a vote seller. Organisers set deadlines and options; they cannot change how elimination treats a ballot once it is cast.
X prohibits coordinating with or compensating others to inflate engagement metrics, and it names Polls among the features covered. The Pet Industry Business Awards name the consequence in their own contest: a business may be investigated, lose votes or be disqualified on reasonable evidence of purchased votes. No seller can stop an organiser from doing that.
Slido says it is alerted when an event gets an unusually high number of votes in a very short time, and Crowdsignal says its built-in measures detect patterns of potentially abusive voting. Ordinary participation arrives spread across the voting window, from different people at different moments. Nothing on this site is a method for getting a vote past a check, and a vote that a tool blocks does not count.
Organiser rules differ: the RSPCA Pet of the Year Awards allow extra votes through donations on their official mechanism, while OpenTable Australia treats a vote cast in exchange for money or a reward as null and void. Both are contest rules, not statutes, and whether payment is lawful where you live is a question for a lawyer. Orders are refused for any contest whose rules ban paid votes, and for political ballots.
Votes ordered for a poll that never appear on its count are refunded after the poll closes. A refund never covers an organiser's decision: Localsearch may void all votes for a disqualified nominee, and Mentimeter says a user whose access it cancels under its Acceptable Use Policy is owed no refund or compensation. No result is promised.